USPTO serial 77432240
MODPLAYER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MODPLAYER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Christopher Lynch
J. Christopher Lynch Foster Pepper PLLC1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3400Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital media kiosks, comprising set-top box, monitor, computer peripherals, camera, headphone, microphone, for searching and purchasing digital content, namely, music, videos, movies, and books for disseminating advertising, promotional, marketing for businesses, and for providing computerized online retail store services for the goods and services of others in the field of electronics products, general merchandise and general consumer goods; computer-operated interactive kiosks comprised of computer hardware and software for use in a wide variety of applications, namely, allowing the public to access information, obtain goods and services, and carry on transactions via a global computer network, namely, the purchase of goods and services, and electronic cash, credit and debit transactions; computer hardware and related operating software | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising and advertisement services provided via kiosks featuring digital or electronic displays; online retail store featuring electronic media, namely, pre-recorded music, music and movies | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among computer users; broadcasting programs via global computer network; wireless communication services, namely, transmission of graphics, music, games and ring tones to mobile electronic devices, namely, cellular phones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), MP3 players, memory cards; pod casting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of computer-operated kiosks used for providing access to a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Production and distribution of motion pictures, radio and television programs; electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others featuring music, books, manuscripts and artwork on CD, DVD, and via interactive computer kiosks comprising computers, computer hardware, computer peripherals, and computer operating software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Custom design of and consultation regarding computer-operated kiosks and touch screen kiosks used for providing access to a global computer network; installation and maintenance of computer software in computer-operated kiosks used for providing access to a global computer network; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer software design for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MOD SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by MOD SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MODPLAYER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 23, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 23, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |