Drawing for DURO

USPTO serial 77465906

DURO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy J. Sinnott

TIMOTHY J. SINNOTT BERESKIN & PARR40TH FLOOR40 KING STREET WESTTORONTO; ON, M5H3Y2

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024unidirectional material comprising high performance fibers and resins intended for use in soft or hard armor ballistic protection in the production of bulletproof and blast proof vests, armor, and equipment as well as composite structural applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 1, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 31, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 28, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 28, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 7, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance