USPTO serial 77470856
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Grace
DAVID W. GRACE LOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 2200LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4120UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, games, playthings, and sporting equipment, namely, infant toys, crib toys, baby multiple activity toys, children's developmental toys, children's activity tables, toy block sets, play cubes, toy furniture and accessories therefor, plush toys, push toys, pull toys, pop-up toys, animated toys, namely, battery operated toys featuring animation and/or sound effects, namely, toy flashlights, illustrated toy blocks, toy television, toy tools, toy vehicles, toy telephone, toy ball, toy steering wheel, toy carousel, wind up toys, punching toys, soft sculpture toys, bath toys, mechanical toys, musical and sound toys namely battery operated music player featuring sound and musical effects, toy music boxes, toy musical instruments, puzzles, ball and peg pounders, disc toss toys, mechanical action toys, drawing toys, magnetic sketching toys, electric action toys, electronic learning toys, bendable toys, construction toys, toy figures, toy animals, fantasy character toys, toy vehicles, toy boats, toy submarines, toy airplanes, toy helicopters, ride-on toys, toy buildings, toy appliances and household items, toy musical instruments, toy banks, toy ATM machines, children's multiple activity toys, imaginative play toys namely, infant development toys, battery operated press down toys; toy science and nature sets comprised of of bug collecting bag with magnifier, bug catcher, whistle, binoculars, tweezers, bug net and water bottle in carrying case, , inflatable toy globes, toy bug magnifying jars, children's play mats containing a design or pattern for children's play, water squirting toys, toy weapons, toy sporting equipment in the nature of fishing rod and reel sets and accessories therefor, foam bat and ball sets, foam swords and foam sword sets, plastic shooting guns, baseballs, toy hockey sets, toy ring toss sets, toy bowling sets, toy paddle and ball sets, children's water toys, toy bows and arrows, toy tents and toy tent sets, rubber action balls, sports balls, inflatable toys, action skill games children's party games, party favors in the nature of small toys, toy jacks, bop bags, beach toys in the nature of sand and water toys and sand box toys, dolls and accessories therefor, dollhouses and accessories therefor; dolls and accessories therefor, dollhouses and accessories therefor, costumes for use in children's dress up play, wood sculpture toys and accessories therefor, toy lacing beads, toy bead sets, kaleidoscopes, toy calculators; toy laptops, toy cameras, toy tools and accessories therefor; toy garden sets; toy recipe sets; toy tote bags for carrying dolls and doll accessories therefor; toy purses, play jewelry and accessories therefor, stack and nesting toys, toy mobile phones, toy math keyboards, toy dashboards, toy stores and toy store sets, namely toy building structures and accessories therefor, finger puppets, toy insects, toy radios | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |