USPTO serial 77481030
EZIAZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EZIAZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay Bettinger
Jay Bettinger Bettinger Law Group, PC3020 Old Ranch Parkway, Suite 300Seal Beach, CA 90740UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing telephone directory assistance, yellow page, commercial and business information services, namely, listings, advertisements and other commercial and business information regarding the goods and services of others through a variety of methods | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, wireless and wired transmission, of voice, voice packets, data, data packets, images, audio, video, signals, software, information, games, ring tones, files and messages; wireless text and numeric digital messaging services; internet service provider, namely, providing multiple user access to a global computer information network, the internet; telecommunication services, namely, the transmission of voice, information and data of all types, including the location of businesses and information related via telephones, personal digital assistants, handheld and other computers, and mobile data receivers and through a global computer information network, the internet, wide area networks, local area networks and private computer information networks; telematics sending and receiving of information; transmission of information via computers connected to the same telematic network; computer services, namely, providing multiple-user access to information, electronic sites and other resources available on computer networks, computers and other electronic devices; providing access to on-line and wireless web pages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eziaz, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Eziaz, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HANCOCK TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS MGMT.CO., LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named EZIAZ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |