USPTO serial 77485897
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARSHA G. GENTNER
MARSHA G. GENTNER JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS FOR USE IN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL, NANOTECHNOLOGICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING PROCESS; CHEMICALS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PHARMACEUTICALS AND DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR SUPPLYING NANOPARTICLES OR MICROPARTICLES OF DRUGS OR FOR SUPPLYING NANOPARTICLES OR MICROPARTICLES CONTAINING DRUGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | EQUIPMENT FOR MANUFACTURING PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, EQUIPMENT FOR SUPPLYING NANOPARTICLES OR MICROPARTICLES OF DRUGS OR FOR SUPPLYING NANOPARTICLES OR MICROPARTICLES CONTAINING DRUGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY, NAMELY, DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES; MANUFACTURE OF CARRIER FOR ADJUVANT PREPARATIONS FOR USE IN PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS TO THE ORDER AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING; PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION; PHARMACEUTICAL CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY TESTING AND CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |