Drawing for GO NATURALLY

USPTO serial 77488769

GO NATURALLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUONG, ANGELA GAW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GO NATURALLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. Goldberg

RICHARD M. GOLDBERG RICHARD M. GOLDBERG25 E SALEM ST STE 419HACKENSACK, NJ 07601-7416UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Organic CandyACTIVEAug 22, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 2, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 1, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 17, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance