USPTO serial 77500000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine P. James
Christine P. James Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800MAILSTOP: IP DOCKETING - 22Atlanta, GA 30309-4528| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business administration and management; assistance in management of business activities, namely, project business case development, project scoping, project delivery strategies, risk management services, project directing services, project governance, provision of project auditing services, project management, corporate consulting, management consulting, business development planning; business management consulting in the field of team development, namely, the procurement, formation and management of a design team comprised of design consultants, specialists and advisors; economic consulting and information for the industrial and commercial sectors for planning, organizing, monitoring and carrying out projects in different sectors of a company, namely, project programming, provision of procurement strategies, procurement of management, business analysis, commercial advisory services, commercial analysis, project commercial review services, economic and feasibility studies and project leadership services; professional consultancy services in relation to business information management | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction management and supervision; construction consultancy, namely, infrastructure risk assessments; pipeline maintenance services; construction project management services; general construction contracting services; construction supervision services; building demolition supervision services; soil stabilization; professional consultancy services in relation to mining; professional consultancy services in relation to quarrying; professional consultancy services in relation to environmental remediation, namely, waste disposal; professional consultancy services in relation to environmental reclamation, namely, land reclamation and mining reclamation; professional consultancy services in relation to environmental health and safety, namely, environmental assessments relating to asbestos removal | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Demolition services, namely, demolition consultancy, supervision and observation services; professional consultancy services in relation to waste management, water treatment, air purification, water purification, waste water reprocessing, waste treatment, gas production, oil production, generation of electricity, generation of energy, generation of power; professional consultancy services in relation to environmental remediation, namely, soil, waste and/or water treatment services; professional consultancy services in relation to environmental health and safety, namely, assessments relating to mold remediation services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Civil engineering; providing quality assurance services in the field of construction; professional consultancy services in relation to environmental and ground engineering, air quality, biological science, archaeology, engineering, hydrogeology, hydrology, geotechnical engineering, geology, geophysics, environmental engineering, civil engineering, environmental feasibility studies; and technical consultancy in the field of environmental safety, namely, detecting pollution; consulting services in the field of environmental assessment, compliance, and planning; environmental services, namely, engineering and consulting services for noise levels and of contaminants in air including asbestos and mould; mining engineering, architecture, software design and development, and website design and development; Professional consultancy services in relation to cultural science | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 28, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 27, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 16, 2022 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 16, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 29, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 29, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |