USPTO serial 77504620
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Cupertino, CA
Cupertino, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. La Perle
THOMAS R. LA PERLE APPLE INC.1 INFINITE LOOPMS: 36-4TMCUPERTINO, CA 94110| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Periodicals and publications, namely, books, magazines, newsletters, brochures, booklets, pamphlets, manuals, journals, leaflets, and catalogues, all relating to digital mobile devices, computer software, computer hardware, consumer electronics, digital technology, telephones and telecommunications, multimedia apparatus and instruments, photography, online retailing, entertainment, music, movies and videos; posters | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair of computers; maintenance and repair of mobile telephones, MP3 players, handheld computers, personal digital assistants, electronic organizers and electronic notepads; maintenance and repair of electronically operated musical apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing online computer databases and directories featuring information in the fields of music, video, film, books, television entertainment, games and sports; entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable pre-recorded music, audio, video and graphics via a global computer network and wireless networks, and providing non-downloadable electronic publications for browsing over computer networks, namely, books, pamphlets, brochures, newsletters, journals, and magazines, on the subjects of computer hardware and software applications and a wide range of topics of general interest; digital imaging services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design and development of computer hardware and software; computer hardware and software consulting services; multimedia and audio-visual software consulting services; computer programming; providing technical troubleshooting support for computer systems, databases and applications; providing consultation services for developing computer systems, databases and applications; providing online information in the field of computer technology; creating and maintaining websites for others; providing search engines for obtaining data via communications networks; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software to enable users to program audio, video, text and other multimedia content, including music, concerts, videos, radio, television, news, sports, games, cultural events, and entertainment-related programs; computer services, namely, hosting on-line facilities, via global computer network, to enable users to program the scheduling of audio, video, text and other multimedia content, including music, concerts, videos, radio, television, news, sports, games, cultural events, and entertainment-related programs as they will be aired; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer services, namely, creating indexes of information, sites and other resources available on global computer networks for others; customized searching at the specific request of end users, allowing the end user to browse and retrieve information, sites, and other resources available on global computer networks; acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks. computer services, namely, creating indexes and databases that organize the content of information provided over a global computer network according to user preference; and consultation services relating to all the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |