USPTO serial 77512851
SUCRAPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUCRAPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
PETER J. RIEBLING KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP2900 K ST NWSTE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5119Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Artificial sweetener, low calorie artificial sweetener for use as a chemical in the manufacture of foodstuffs and pharmaceuticals; artificial sweetener or low calorie artificial sweetener for use in non-alcoholic drinks; artificial sweetener or low calorie artificial sweetener for use in alcoholic drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Food for diabetics, namely, artificial sweetener adapted for diabetics, dietetic foods in the nature of artificial sweetener adapted for medical purposes, pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of weight disorders or diabetes containing artificial sweetener | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Low calorie natural sweetener, low calorie natural sweetener for use in alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks; foodstuffs containing artificial sweetener or low calorie artificial or natural sweetener, namely, coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour; processed cereals and cereal-based snack food, bread, pastry and frozen confection, flavored ices, honey, treacle, yeast, baking powder, mustard, vinegar, sauces, spices, ice | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beers, mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, in the nature of flavored waters, soft drinks, mixers, energy drinks and sports drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juices, syrups for making beverages, all including artificial sweetener or low calorie artificial or natural sweetener | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, excluding beers, namely, wine or cocktails containing artificial sweetener or low calorie artificial or natural sweetener | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fusion Nutraceuticals Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named SUCRAPLUS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |