Drawing for TRI-VIA

USPTO serial 77541465

TRI-VIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRI-VIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony P. DeLio

ANTHONY P. DELIO DELIO & PETERSON, LLC121 WHITNEY AVENEW HAVEN, CT 06510-1242UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030BAKED GOODS, NAMELY, BREADS STUFFED WITH BROCCOLI AND CHEESE, PEPPERONI AND CHEESE, SPINACH AND CHEESE, SAUSAGE EGG AND CHEESE; PIZZA; CALZONES; PASTA; SAUCES; AND DESSERTS, NAMELY, CAKES; PASTRIES; AND SWEET BREADSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 21, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 21, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 26, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance