Drawing for LOWFARES.COM

USPTO serial 77542010

LOWFARES.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOWFARES.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott R. Miller

SCOTT R. MILLER CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 2300LOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Price comparison services, namely, providing on-line price comparisons in the field of travel, lodging, airline transportation, car rental, and travel tour packages via a website featuring links to other travel and lodging websitesACTIVEAug 15, 2005
039Computer services, namely, providing a portal website featuring links to other websites in the fields of travel and lodging, via a global computer network; providing airline transportation, car rental, travel tour package, and general travel information via a global computer network; providing an Internet website portal in the field of travelACTIVEAug 15, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 13, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 13, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 28, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 23, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 27, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 21, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 21, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 1, 2010GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Apr 1, 2010GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 13, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 2, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 11, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance