USPTO serial 77561711
COMPUTERTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3769489Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2010
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMPUTERTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami, FL
Miami, FL
Port Washington, NY
PORT WASHINGTON, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
Stacey R. Halpern Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital media, namely, DVDs featuring instruction and demonstrations on how to use computers, computer technology, software and internet applications; digital media, namely, downloadable audio and video recordings featuring instruction on how to use computers and computer technology, software and internet applications, none of the foregoing relating to use of a computer as a television | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2009 |
| 035 | Providing consumer information in the field of computers and computer technology; promotional services, namely, promoting the goods of others using online video, audio and textual material via the internet, none of the foregoing relating to use of a computer as a television | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2008 |
| 038 | Streaming of audio and video material on the internet in the field of computers and computer technology; television broadcasting; cable television broadcasting, none of the foregoing relating to use of a computer as a television | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2009 |
| 041 | Television production; entertainment services in the nature of providing personalized and interactive television programming; educational services available on the internet in the nature of seminars and workshops on the subject of computers and computer technology; entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts and webcasts in the field of computers and computer technology; providing on-line publications in the nature of blogs and online journals on how to use computers, computer technology, software and internet applications, none of the foregoing relating to use of a computer as a television | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TigerDirect, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SYX SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SYX Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SYX SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named COMPUTERTV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 24, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |