Drawing for VIRTUAL CONCIERGE

USPTO serial 77600833

VIRTUAL CONCIERGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUAL CONCIERGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David V. Radack

DAVID V. RADACK ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC600 GRANT STREET, 44TH FLOORU.S. STEEL TOWERPITTSBURGH, PA 15219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Providing financial risk management information and insurance information via emails, personalized websites and electronic press releases and announcementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 5, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 5, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 20, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 27, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 27, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 27, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 5, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 5, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 18, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 11, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 5, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 5, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance