Drawing for DEEPSEA

USPTO serial 77607232

DEEPSEA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LITZAU, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DEEPSEA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert H. Cameron

ROBERT H. CAMERON ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON101 N. TRYON STREETSUITE 1900CHARLOTTE, NC 28246

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Drilling rigs, namely, floating, non-floating and sub-sea mechanical installations for drilling and extraction of oil and gas, and component parts for such equipment; equipment for oil drilling, namely, dual drilling and derrick systems, top drives, pipe handling equipment, subsea equipment, blowout preventing equipment, remote controlled casing tongs, remote controlled drilling systems; drilling rigs, floating and non-floating; drilling derricks, floating and non-floating; machines and machine tools, namely, dual drilling machinery, top drives, roughnecks, pipe handling machinery, blow out preventing systems, subsea equipment for drilling operations; motors and engines other than for land vehicles; machine couplings and transmission components other than for land vehiclesACTIVE—
009Apparatus and instruments for conveying, distributing, transforming, storing, regulating or controlling electric current; computer software for use in operations and management of oil drilling, computer software for drilling modelling and drilling simulation; data processing equipment, namely, computer hardware; computersACTIVE—
035Advertising services; business management; business administration and office work; e-commerce services, namely, computerized on-line ordering services in the field of e-learningACTIVE—
037Oil rig and gas rig contractor and construction services for the oil industry and within the field of oil and gas; installation and maintenance of drilling equipment for oil and gas installations; rental of drilling equipment for use in the oil industry; building construction and repairACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services and research and design in the field of drilling technology, drilling vessels, drilling vessels design and engineering, casing services, well management, drilling engineering, subsea equipment and engineering; industrial research in the field of drilling equipment, drilling technology, drilling engineering, well engineering, casing equipment, subsea engineering, drilling modelling and simulation software; design and development of computer hardware and software; oil-well testing; technical consultancy and engineering services regarding oil and gas drilling; oil prospectingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 15, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 15, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 15, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 15, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 7, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance