USPTO serial 77607232
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert H. Cameron
ROBERT H. CAMERON ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON101 N. TRYON STREETSUITE 1900CHARLOTTE, NC 28246| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Drilling rigs, namely, floating, non-floating and sub-sea mechanical installations for drilling and extraction of oil and gas, and component parts for such equipment; equipment for oil drilling, namely, dual drilling and derrick systems, top drives, pipe handling equipment, subsea equipment, blowout preventing equipment, remote controlled casing tongs, remote controlled drilling systems; drilling rigs, floating and non-floating; drilling derricks, floating and non-floating; machines and machine tools, namely, dual drilling machinery, top drives, roughnecks, pipe handling machinery, blow out preventing systems, subsea equipment for drilling operations; motors and engines other than for land vehicles; machine couplings and transmission components other than for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for conveying, distributing, transforming, storing, regulating or controlling electric current; computer software for use in operations and management of oil drilling, computer software for drilling modelling and drilling simulation; data processing equipment, namely, computer hardware; computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising services; business management; business administration and office work; e-commerce services, namely, computerized on-line ordering services in the field of e-learning | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Oil rig and gas rig contractor and construction services for the oil industry and within the field of oil and gas; installation and maintenance of drilling equipment for oil and gas installations; rental of drilling equipment for use in the oil industry; building construction and repair | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design in the field of drilling technology, drilling vessels, drilling vessels design and engineering, casing services, well management, drilling engineering, subsea equipment and engineering; industrial research in the field of drilling equipment, drilling technology, drilling engineering, well engineering, casing equipment, subsea engineering, drilling modelling and simulation software; design and development of computer hardware and software; oil-well testing; technical consultancy and engineering services regarding oil and gas drilling; oil prospecting | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |