USPTO serial 77614638
BORETTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BORETTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AT Watergang, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth F. Janda
ELIZABETH F. JANDA BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRIC FOOD PROCESSORS AND DISHWASHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | APPARATUS FOR LIGHTING, HEATING, STEAM GENERATING, COOKING, REFRIGERATING, DRYING, VENTILATING, WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY PURPOSES, NAMELY, WOOD-FIRED STOVES AND COOKERS, GAS COOKERS, ELECTRIC HOTPLATES, DOMESTIC COOKING OVENS, COMBINATION MICROWAVE/ELECTRIC OVENS, EXHAUST HOODS FOR KITCHENS, BUILT-IN ELECTRIC RANGE UNITS, REFRIGERATORS AND FREEZERS, CHIMNEY FLUES, MIXER TAPS FOR WATER PIPES, TAPS, CAST-IRON GRILL BARBEQUE GRILLS, CAST IRON GAS GRILLS, CAST IRON PLATES FOR USE ON GAS GRILLS, ELECTRIC RACKS FOR KEEPING FOOD WARM, ELECTRIC ESPRESSO MACHINES, REFRIGERATORS, INDOOR AND OUTDOOR GRILLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | HOUSEHOLD OR KITCHEN UTENSILS AND CONTAINERS (NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL OR COATED THEREWITH), NAMELY CHOPPING BOARDS, CRUET STANDS FOR OIL AND VINEGAR, SALT AND PEPPER POTS, WASTE BINS, COFFEE CUPS AND SAUCERS, MILK JUGS, KITCHEN PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERS, PASTA PANS, PANS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |