USPTO serial 77624789
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Bothwell, Scotland, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis C. Cullman
LOUIS C. CULLMAN K&L GATES LLP1900 MAIN STREET, SUITE 600IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care preparations including instant self tanning creams, exfoliating gels, moisturizing lotions, skin scrubs, tanning gels, tanning foams, tanning oils, sun screening preparations, lip balms, lip gloss, lip liner, bronzing powders; nail polish, eye brow pencil, mascara, eye shadow, eye pencil, eye liner; perfume, cologne, toilet water and essential oils; cosmetics; hair care products | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical, hygienic and beauty care services; skin care services; skin care salons; beauty salons; sun tanning salons; skin care services; sun tanning services; consultancy and advisory services relating to the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |