USPTO serial 77627176
MAVEN BY TORI SPELLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAVEN BY TORI SPELLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.
JONATHAN D REICHMAN KENYON & KENYON LLP1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household and kitchen items of all types, namely, mugs, cups, plates, dishes, saucers, bowls, flatware, utensils, soup bowls, salad bowls, sugar bowls, gravy boats, salt and pepper shakers, butter dishes, sugar and creamer sets, condiment dispensers for household use; napkin holders, candlestick holders, serving spoons, food servers, whisks, serving ladles, spatulas, scoops, serving forks, kitchen tongs, mixing and serving bowls, platters and trays; beverage glassware; beverage ware, namely, drinking glasses, tumblers, coolers; insulated beverage servers; cutting boards; kitchen tool sets, namely, wooden spoons, wooden spatulas, wooden forks, whisks and a holder therefor; teapots, coffeepots, vases, butter dishes, jugs, casserole dishes, storage jars, egg cup, cake plates, soup tureens, place mats, drink coasters, table mats, canisters, pitchers, wine glasses, highball glasses and cocktail glasses; earthen figurines; combs; hair brushes; articles of porcelain, namely, baking containers, baking dishes, plates, dishes, saucers and mugs, cups, trays, dinnerware; figures and figurines; earthenware items, namely, baking containers, baking dishes, boxes, cookery moulds, crockery, namely, plates, dishes, saucers and mugs, cups, figures and figurines, garden gnomes, jugs, plant containers; baskets and holders, planters, plaques, plates, saucepans, statues and statuettes; rectangular and oval baking dishes, covered vegetable bowl, gravy boats, non-electric coffee servers not composed of precious metal, candle stick holders not composed of precious metal, non-electric crocks, cookie jars, coasters, casserole dishes, decanters, trivets, canisters, napkin holders, baskets, chip and dip bowl sets, candy dishes; glass beverageware; plastic cutting boards; carafes; teapots and colanders for household use not composed of precious metal; acrylic food storage jars for household use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |