Drawing for CLEARFLOW

USPTO serial 77657743

CLEARFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEARFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tara A. Branscom

Tara A. Branscom LECLAIR RYAN10 S. Jefferson StreetSuite 1800Roanoke, VA 24011

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for converting video, images, audio, and data from one digital format to another, computer software for content/asset management, digital electronic devices for recording, organizing, transmitting, receiving, manipulating, playing and reviewing text, data, image, audio and video files; computer software for use in organizing, processing, distributing, transmitting, streaming, receiving, manipulating, playing and reviewing image, audio, video and multimedia files and content; computer hardware and software for controlling the operation of audio and video devices and for viewing, searching and/or playing audio, video, television, movies, photographs and other digital images, and other multimedia content; computer hardware and software tools for producing, managing and inserting advertising content into television programming and other video content for on-demand viewing, including on-demand video content and content stored on other devicesACTIVE—
035Advertising and business management consultancy, namely, the creation and provision of media asset management of digital advertising assets such as print, video, audio and data; advertising, marketing, and promoting the goods and services of others, namely, placement and dissemination of advertising for others via the internet and computer networks for display in a television environment; management and compilation of computerized databases, namely, managing customer data in a computer database for others; computerized database management of performance data regarding content usage; computerized database management of content/video assetsACTIVE—
038Audio and video streaming services via Internet, Internet protocol television (IPTV), cable, or satellite, namely, transmission of audio and video content to others via a global communications network; video on demand transmission services; telecommunications services, namely, transmission of video images compatible with open network communication formats via a global communications network; on-demand delivery of movies, television programming, and other video content via IP-based (internet protocol-based) network deliveryACTIVE—
041Cable television programming; syndication of movies, television programming, and other video content for others via IP-based network deliveryACTIVE—
042Computer network management services, namely, administration of a computer network designed to facilitate the capture, transmission, editing, management and/or broadcast of digital images, audio and video content; administration of a computer network designed to monitor and measure network bandwidth demands, to allocate appropriate pools of bandwidth to satisfy network requirements, and to coordinate digital media content transmission to and from individual and multiple sites; transcoding, send-for-review, review-and-approval, marking available inventory, and file attachment of digital advertising assets; electronic encoding and transcoding of video/audio dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 15, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 4, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 4, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance