Drawing for CLEARPROFIT

USPTO serial 77657749

CLEARPROFIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEARPROFIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tara A. Branscom

Tara A. Branscom LECLAIR RYAN10 S. Jefferson StreetSuite 1800Roanoke, VA 24011

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software tools for producing, managing and inserting advertising content into television programming and other video content for on-demand viewing, including on-demand video content and content stored on other devicesACTIVE—
035Advertising services, namely, the creation and provision of media asset management of digital advertising assets such as print, video, audio and data; advertising, marketing, and promoting the goods and services of others, namely, placement and dissemination of advertising for others via the internet and computer networks for display in a television environment; management and compilation of computerized databases, namely, managing customer data in a computer database for others; computerized database management of performance data regarding content usage; computerized database management of content/video assetsACTIVE—
038Audio and video streaming services via Internet, Internet protocol television (IPTV), cable, or satellite, namely, transmission of audio and video content to others via a global communications network; video on demand transmission services; telecommunications services, namely, transmission of video images compatible with open network communication formats via a global communications networkACTIVE—
042Transcoding, send-for-review, review-and-approval, marking available inventory, and file attachment of digital advertising assets; electronic encoding and transcoding of video/audio dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 18, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 16, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 16, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 28, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 14, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance