USPTO serial 77662160
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Elmira, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott F. Landis
SCOTT F. LANDIS BARLEY SNYDER LLC126 E KING STLANCASTER, PA 17602-2832UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Services of providing financing and costs re-imbursement to prospective customers of geothermal heating systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Consulting services for the design, maintenance, installment and repair of geothermal heating, cooling and hot water systems and products; Providing information relating to geothermal equipment and parts and providing on-going technical support | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Services of providing custom training to prospective customers of geothermal heating systems; Providing value-added services to dealers of geothermal heating equipment, namely, offering geothermal training and certification | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing geothermal renewable energy technology research and development and design engineering | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |