Drawing for SMARTFM

USPTO serial 77689198

SMARTFM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTFM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa S. Dillenbeck

MELISSA S. DILLENBECK DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP191 N WACKER DR STE 3700CHICAGO, IL 60606-1615UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Educational computer software featuring instruction in the field of learning process improvement; computer game software, data processors and computers used for learningACTIVE—
015Electrical and electronic musical instruments used to teach musical skillsACTIVE—
028Electronic educational game machines for children and adults, and hand held unit for playing electronic gamesACTIVE—
041Interactive and adaptive training services in the field of learning processes, namely, paired-associate learning and serial and non-serial skill-based learning, in corporate, military and financial environments; educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in person and via a global computer network, in the field of learning processes, namely, paired-associate learning and serial and non-serial skill-based learning, in corporate, military and financial environments; providing training and seminars, educational conferences and workshops in the fields of business management and advertisingACTIVE—
042Scientific and industrial research on learning processes; computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to form virtual communities, conduct discussions, receive feedback from their peers and engage in social networking in the field of learningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 12, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 12, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 8, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 4, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 2, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 22, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 7, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance