Drawing for DOUBLE APPLE

USPTO serial 77692764

DOUBLE APPLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PILARO, MARK F
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOUBLE APPLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greger

Jeffrey H. Greger Lowe Hauptman Ham & Berner, LLP1700 Diagonal RoadSuite 300Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034TobaccoABANDONEDNov 30, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 3, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2010ISPOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Aug 31, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2010AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED—
Jul 23, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 23, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2010IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jul 3, 2010AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 3, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 2, 2010EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2009LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jun 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance