USPTO serial 77693558
TREENN.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TREENN.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dieppe, New Brunswick, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
ANDREW S. EHARD MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded videotapes, DVDs and other electronic media featuring information in the field of reforestation, environmental initiatives and the role of well managed forests, forest certification and recycled paper; Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines, brochures and newsletters in the field of reforestation, environmental initiatives and the role of well managed forests, forest certification and recycled paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Facial tissue, bathroom tissue, paper towels, paper napkins; Photographs; Printed publications, namely, magazines, brochures and newsletters in the field of reforestation, environmental initiatives and the role of well managed forests, forest certification and recycled paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Reforestation services in the nature of managing forests; providing a website which promotes public awareness of environmental issues and initiatives such as reforestation, the role of well managed forests, forest certification and recycled paper; providing a website in the field of reforestation services in the nature of managing forests; Providing news and information in the field of reforestation in the nature of managing forests, environmental initiatives and the role of well managed forests, forest certification and recycled paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Broadcasting services via television, radio and the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing online publications in the nature of non-downloadable magazines, brochures and newsletters in the field of reforestation, environmental initiatives and the role of well managed forests, forest certification and recycled paper; videotaping services; providing a blog featuring videos, images and text in the field of reforestation, environmental initiatives and the role of well managed forests, forest certification and recycled paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Reforestation services in the nature of planting trees; Providing a website featuring videos, images and text in the field of reforestation in the nature of planting trees; Providing news and information in the field of reforestation in the nature of planting trees; Interviewing and reporting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Irving Tissue Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named TREENN.COM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |