Drawing for RELOCATION MADE EASY

USPTO serial 77693777

RELOCATION MADE EASY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RELOCATION MADE EASY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie E. Kretzschmer

JULIE E. KRETZSCHMER HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWWARTZ AND COHN, LLP38500 WOODWARD AVENUESUITE 100BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Mortgage lending, origination and servicing of mortgage loansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 10, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 10, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 26, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 1, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 9, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 9, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 7, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 10, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance