USPTO serial 77694151
GIRLS NITE OUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ULRICH, NANCY G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GIRLS NITE OUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel D. Myers
Joel D. Myers Myers Business Law, LLCTwo Ravinia Drive, Suite 500Atlanta, GA 30346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Boxes for timepieces; Jewelry boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Beverage glassware; Beverage stirrers; Bowls; Cake servers; Candle holders; Ceramic sculptures, vases, vessels, bowls, plates and pots; Charms for attachment to beverage glassware for identification purposes; Coasters not of paper and not being table linen; Cocktail shakers; Coffee servers; Cooling buckets for wine; Decorative plates; Dishes and plates; Foam drink holders; Glass bowls; Glass mugs; Glass stoppers; Hand-operated grinders; Insulating sleeve holders for beverage cans; Napkin holders; Napkin holders and napkin rings not of precious metal; Napkin rings; Non-electric coffee servers not of precious metal; Pepper grinders; Pie servers; Pitchers; Plastic coasters; Salt and pepper shakers; Serving forks; Serving spoons; Swizzle sticks; Wine buckets; Wine glasses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2009 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |