USPTO serial 77696054
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Alpharetta, GA
Alpharetta, GA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth M. Fox
ELIZABETH M. FOX KING & SPALDING LLP1180 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30309-3531UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed foods, namely, fruits and vegetables, seafood, poultry, beef, pork, nuts, coconut, beans, potatoes and mushrooms; fruit-based pie fillings; sliced apples; applesauce; apple chips; spiced apple rings; jams and jellies; peanut butter; soup bases, specifically broths, extracts, and preparations for making soup; bacon bits; sausage; bacon; canned entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; beef stew; corned beef hash; French fries; canned cheese; hot dogs; eggs; evaporated and dry milk; non-dairy creamer; shortenings and cooking oils; butter and margarines; raisins; prunes; soup; frozen fruits and vegetables; salads, except pasta, rice, and macaroni salads; whipped toppings; unflavored and unsweetened gelatins; all of the foregoing for sale to the foodservice industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cheese sauces; pasta; dry mixes and batters, namely, cake and bread mixes and mixes for making baking batters; honey; sugar; spices, seasonings and food flavorings not prepared from essential oils; flavored and sweetened gelatins and puddings; chocolate-based pie fillings; custard-based pie fillings; cookies; marshmallows; salt; coffee and tea; vinegar; catsup; mustard; soy sauce; maple syrups, chocolate syrups, flavoring syrups, pancake syrups, table syrups and topping syrups; canned pasta; pasta, rice and macaroni salads; mayonnaise and salad dressings; candy; rice; horseradish sauce; flour; shakes; bakery goods; and relishes; all of the foregoing for sale to the foodservice industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Soft drink bases, specifically concentrates, essences, syrups and powders used in the preparation of soft drinks; bases for making milk shakes; drinking water, fruit drinks, soft drinks; fruit juice concentrates; fruit juices; syrups for making soft drinks; lemon juice; all of the foregoing for sale to the foodservice industry | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |