USPTO serial 77696179
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ALEXANDRIA, MD
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward Sharkey
Edward Sharkey Law Office of Edward E. Sharkey4641 Montgomery Ave Suite 500Bethesda, MD 20814UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Data processing equipment and computers; computer programs and software for downloading, transmitting, receiving, providing, publishing, extracting, encoding, decoding, reading, storing, and organizing data for establishing and maintaining a network of individuals having a common interest and for maintaining communication therebetween ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2009 |
| 038 | providing a telecommunications service that facilitates the exchange of information between individuals having a common interest in parenting and related issues of concern to mothers through the electronic transmission of data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2009 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 11, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |