Drawing for FRANKLIN COVEY. EMAILPLUS

USPTO serial 77696944

FRANKLIN COVEY. EMAILPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRANKLIN COVEY. EMAILPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing a website that allows users to manage, develop, and maintain e-mail marketing campaigns; providing a website that allows users to create industry approved marketing messages and which features pre-designed templates for uploading company logos, colors, and photos and allows advertisers to create mailing lists and manage and track e-mail marketing campaignsACTIVE—
038Providing e-mail transmission services; electronic mail services featuring the tracking and sorting of opened and read e-mails and attachments; transmission of electronic content to smart phones, handheld computers, laptops, mobile electronic devices and PC clientsACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for managing, developing, and maintaining e-mail marketing campaigns and for developing e-mails through a step-by-step wizard to create industry approved rich marketing messages, featuring pre-designed templates for uploading company logos, colors and photos; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software for tracking and sorting marketing e-mails and attachments, and for mailing list creation either manually or with an existing contact list, CSV file or tab delimited fileACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 12, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 8, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 11, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 7, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance