Drawing for EMDEON PAYMENT 360

USPTO serial 77697194

EMDEON PAYMENT 360

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMDEON PAYMENT 360?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Brewer, Paige W. Mills, and Ryann M. Schneider

ROBERT L BREWER BASS BERRY & SIMS PLC150 3RD AVENUE SOUTHSUITE 2800NASHVILLE, TN 37201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business services, namely, facilitating the billing and reconciliation of payments for healthcare services among patients, providers and health care payersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 29, 2010GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 29, 2010GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 6, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 4, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance