USPTO serial 77697255
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tawnya R. Wojciechowski
TAWNYA R WOJCIECHOWSKI TRW LAW GROUP19900 MACARTHUR BLVDSUITE 1150IRVINE, CA 92612-8433| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Physician referral services; health care utilization, review and cost containment services, all in the healthcare field; medical cost management and cost management for health benefit plans of others; business administration of acute medical care programs and services provided to Medicare beneficiaries and others who live in nursing homes, hospices and convalescent homes; direct physician referral services; cost management of health benefit plans covering prescription drug benefits, dental care, vision and hearing care, discount eyeglasses and medical transportation, namely costs associated with ambulance and medical evacuation transportation and care, hospice and convalescent care | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Underwriting medical insurance services in the nature of health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations; administration of health benefit plans of others; administration of insurance claims for health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organization healthcare providers; administration of prescription drug benefit plans of others; medical insurance case and utilization review and insurance claims adjustment services for healthcare purchasers and payors and providers and Medicare beneficiaries; administration of health insurance plans for eligible Medicare beneficiaries | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services, namely, physician groups offering primary medical care services via health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations' medical programs; chronic care medical services; medical clinics, pre-surgical evaluation clinics, comprehensive care clinics, diabetes and wound clinics, anticoagulation clinics, podiatry services; hospitals; providing in-home and out-patient physician and nursing care services; emergency medical response services; medical evaluation services, namely, functional assessment programs for patients receiving medical rehabilitation services for purposes of guiding treatment and assessing program effectiveness; providing hospice and convalescent home care services; hospitalist programs, namely, providing physician services by physicians who specialize in treating the hospitalized patients of other physicians; and physical therapy, all the foregoing excluding clinical services for patients who require immunoglobulin therapy | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 22, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2010 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |