USPTO serial 77697380
HARKCON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HARKCON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. Toikka
RICHARD S. TOIKKA FARKAS+TOIKKA, LLP11016 WICKSHIRE WAYROCKVILLE, MD 20852-3223UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and business management consultancy; Business administration consultancy; Business advisory services, consultancy and information; Business consultation; Business consultation in the field of personnel management; Business consultation services; Business consulting and information services; Business consulting, management, planning and supervision; Business management and consultation; Business management and consultation in the field of case management, integrated justice, data conversions, and business intelligence; Business management and consultation in the field of personnel management; Business management consultancy and advisory services; Business management consultancy services; Business management consultation; Business management consultation in the field of executive and leadership development; Business management consulting; Business management consulting and advisory services; Business management consulting in the field of team development; Consultancy of personnel recruitment; Consulting in the fields of business organization and management; Consulting services in business leadership development and business management; Consulting services in the field of dental practice management; Consulting services in the field of higher education administration; Consulting services in the field of human resources development, namely, utilizing technology for the promotion of employee retention, career growth and increased productivity for employees and employers; Consulting services, namely, expert analysis and management consulting in economics and accounting; Employment recruiting consultation; Human resources consultation; Information, advisory and consultancy services relating to business and management or business administration, including such services provided on line or via the internet; Management and business consulting services in the field of training and recruitment; Management and business consulting services in the field of personnel management; Personnel consultancy; Personnel management consultation; Providing business management information in connection with consulting and advisory services in the field of strategic planning; Providing organizational development consulting services | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |