USPTO serial 77698443
CYPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Michal
Robert P. Michal Lucas & Mercanti, LLP475 Park Avenue South, 15th FloorNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Turbines, not for land vehicles; ram air turbines other than for land vehicles; generators for wind turbines; electricity generators; electricity generators, including but not limited to, solar-powered and wind-powered electricity generators | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Solar cells; solar batteries; grids for batteries; wind turbine controller; batteries; electric control devices for heating and energy management; electrical power supplies; meters for measuring the quantity of energy; Dc/AC power converters; computer programs for scientific data analysis; electrical distribution systems, namely, power distribution panels; computer software for the control of energy apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Solar collectors; solar energy based cooling apparatus; solar heat collection panels; solar thermal installations, namely, solar thermal modules; solar thermal air systems for heating purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming services; computer consultation; computer software consultancy; computer software design and development; computer software installation and maintenance; computer systems analysis; technical planning of solar energy based plants; designing and testing of energy products for others; design for others in the field of energy engineering; technology planning and consulting in the field of solar energy; design and testing for new product development; consultancy in the field of energy-saving | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cypress Wind Turbines Oy
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CYPRESS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |