Drawing for ROGUE TELEVISION

USPTO serial 77698620

ROGUE TELEVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROGUE TELEVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carol A. Genis

CAROL A GENIS K&L GATES LLPPO BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of motion picture films; cinema studios; cinema theaters, cinematographic adaptation and editing; direction of making radio or television programs; distribution of radio programs for others; distribution of television programming to cable television systems; production of radio or television programs; distribution of television programs for others; editing of radio and television programmes; providing advice and information for film concept and script development; film editingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 28, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 13, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 25, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 31, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 25, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 6, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 16, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 16, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 25, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 25, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 26, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 25, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 25, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 15, 2010GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2010GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 24, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 24, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 23, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 22, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance