Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77699113?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77699113. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns CENTER OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77699113, the listed owner(s) include: Franklin County Historical Society.

What is USPTO serial number 77699113?

Serial number 77699113 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark CENTER OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of CENTER OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY?

CENTER OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY (77699113) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover CENTER OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77699113

CENTER OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Mar 25, 2009
Status date: Nov 30, 2012
Registration date: —
Examiner: BLAIR, JASON
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CENTER OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Franklin County Historical Society
Columbus, OH
Other trademarks owned by Franklin County Historical Society

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cory M. Amron

RICHARD S DONNELL VORYS SATER SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP1909 K STREET NW9TH FLOORWASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	Education and entertainment services, namely, operating a museum and conducting workshops, programs and demonstrations in the field of science	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Nov 30, 2012	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 30, 2012	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 30, 2012	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Sep 5, 2012	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Nov 9, 2011	RBFT	REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES	—
Oct 6, 2011	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Oct 6, 2011	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Oct 6, 2011	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Aug 19, 2011	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 10, 2011	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jun 10, 2011	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jun 10, 2011	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
May 10, 2011	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
May 10, 2011	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
May 3, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 2, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 2, 2011	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2011	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
May 2, 2011	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
May 2, 2011	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Mar 1, 2011	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 1, 2011	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2010	AAUA	NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED	—
Aug 7, 2010	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Aug 7, 2010	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 7, 2010	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 7, 2010	IUAA	USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED	—
Jul 19, 2010	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 19, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 19, 2010	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2010	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2010	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2010	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2010	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 28, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 28, 2010	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
May 14, 2010	AUPC	AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
May 14, 2010	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
May 14, 2010	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2010	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2010	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2010	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 23, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 23, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2009	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Mar 30, 2009	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Mar 28, 2009	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—