Drawing for COLOR TECH

USPTO serial 77699218

COLOR TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLOR TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Darren S. Rimer

DARREN S. RIMER RIMER & MATHEWSON LLP30021 Tomas, Suite 300Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Baby hair conditioner; Bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; Coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Glitter for cosmetic purposes; Hair balsam; Hair bleaching preparations; Hair care preparations consisting of organic coconut virgin oil and coconut virgin oil; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair color removers; Hair colorants; Hair coloring preparations; Hair colouring and dyes; Hair conditioners for babies; Hair creams; Hair curling preparations; Hair decolorants; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair lighteners; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair products, namely, thickening control creams; Hair relaxers; Hair relaxing preparations; Hair rinses; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair sprays; Hair sprays and hair gels; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling fixative in the nature of hair wax; Hair styling preparations; Hair styling spray; Hair tonics; Hair waving preparations; Hair wax; Hydrogen peroxide for use on the hair; Impregnated cleaning pads impregnated with cosmetics; Non-medicated hair restoration lotions; Non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; Non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin, hair and scalp; Oil baths for hair care; Oils for hair conditioning; Preparations for permanent hair waves; Preparations for setting hair; Styling clay for hair; Styling foam for hair; Styling paste for hairACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 3, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 3, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 24, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 19, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 10, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 28, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 22, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 22, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 10, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 18, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance