Drawing for AZO

USPTO serial 77700837

AZO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AZO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. Zeigler

Thomas A. Zeigler AlvaradoSmith1 MacArthur PlaceSuite 200Santa Ana, CA 92707

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic and non-fermented beverages containing vegetable juices, fruit juice extracts and vegetable and fruit juice blends; soft drinks, energy drinks, and sports drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 6, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 6, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 11, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 26, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2009CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2009GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2009GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2009CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 11, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2009TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Apr 1, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance