USPTO serial 77700880
SR SAN RAFAEL DELICATESSEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3858846Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 2010
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SR SAN RAFAEL DELICATESSEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Pedro Garza Garcia, MX
San Pedro Garza Garcia, MX
San Pedro Garza Garcia, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert B. Kimball, Jr.
ALBERT B. KIMBALL, JR. BRACEWELL & GIULIANI LLP711 LOUISIANA STSTE 2300HOUSTON, TX 77002-2849Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meats, cold cuts meats, processed meats, namely, hams sausages, salamis, bologna, chorizo, pastrami, loin, turkey breast, pig's feet, sliced beef, pork sausage, turkey sausage, roast beef, pepperoni, bacon cheese, butter, margarine, cream, yogurts, vegetable salads, fruit salads, breaded chicken breasts, seasoned chicken breasts, breaded fish fillets, breaded fish strips, french fried potatoes, grilled chicken fajitas, oriental style chicken fajitas, frozen shrimp, breaded frozen shrimp, corn dogs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages, tea, cocoa non medical, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee, flour for foods and preparations made from cereals, namely, breakfast cereals bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, cakes, cookies, pies, pizza and waffles, edible ices, honey, treacle, yeast for food preparation for human consumption, baking-powder, cooking salt, mustard, vinegar, ice for refreshment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sigma Alimentos, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Sigma Alimentos, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Sigma Alimentos, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SR SAN RAFAEL DELICATESSEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |