USPTO serial 77701336
BVCCR-REACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BVCCR-REACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bureau Veritas, Registre International de Classification de Navires et D'Aeronefs
Neuilly-sur-Seine, FR
Bureau Veritas, Registre International de Classification de Navires et D'Aeronefs
Courbevoie 92400, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradford S. Breen
Bradford S. Breen Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPIP Prosecution Department4 Park Plaza, Suite 1600Irvine, CA 92614-2558Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing user access to proprietary collections of information by means of global computer information networks in connection with data ascertainment from supply chains of products as to their chemical ingredients; providing user access to databases in computer networks, in particular in connection with data ascertainment from supply chains of products as to their chemical ingredients; providing access to interactive databases in connection with data ascertainment from supply chains of products as to their chemical ingredients | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Industrial analysis and research services in the field of chemical substances and product ingredients; design and development of computer hardware and computer software in connection with data ascertainment from supply chains of products as to their chemical ingredients; chemical analysis; conducting of technical tests and scientific investigations, namely, conducting chemical testing of products as to their chemical ingredients; technical and scientific survey reports, namely, chemical surveying of products to ascertain chemical ingredients and product safety; research in the field of environmental protection; chemical research; technical research in the field of chemical substances; material testing; searching and retrieving information in databases and on the Internet for others for science and research purposes;quality control for others; technical consultancy and technical project studies in the field of chemical substances and product ingredients; environmental impact assessment; basic material testing; scientific research; certifications, namely, testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of certification | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bureau Veritas, Registre International de Classification de Navires et D'Aeronefs
- Other trademarks owned by Bureau Veritas, Registre International de Classification de Navires et D'Aeronefs
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BVCCR-REACH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |