USPTO serial 77702401
DF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SERVANCE, RENEE L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia Spoor Gard
JULIA S GARD BARNES & THORNBURG LLP1717 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUESUITE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing sold as merchandise, namely, shirts, sweaters, shorts, infant and toddler one piece clothing, baby bibs not of paper | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |