USPTO serial 77703153
CROSIBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4637408Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2014
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CROSIBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard F. Mandelbaum
Howard F. Mandelbaum Mandelbaum Silfin Economou LLP222 BLOOMINGDALE ROADSUITE 120WHITE PLAINS, NY 10605Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine parts, namely, filters for water filtration machines, filters for sewage filtration machines, filters for waste water treatment machines, filters for mud drilling machines, filters for pulp processing machines, filters for mineral extraction machines, filters for metallurgical refining machines; filters for machines used for process filtration in the pharmaceutical, chemical, paper and board manufacturing, oil drilling and refining, mining, food and beverage, smelting, natural gas and building industries; machine filters for vacuum filtration, pressure filtration, gravity filtration and centrifuge filtration all for use with various machines, namely, water filtration machines, sewage filtration machines, waste water treatment machines, mud drilling machines, pulp processing machines, mineral extraction machines, metallurgical refining machines, pharmaceutical industry machines, chemical industry machines, paper and board manufacturing industry machines, oil drilling and refining industry machines, mining industry machines, food and beverage preparation industry machines, smelting industry machines, building products manufacturing industry machines, and natural gas industry machines; filter materials and cloths and belt filter materials and cloths for use in machines for vacuum filtration, pressure filtration, gravity filtration and centrifuge filtration, namely, woven fabric filter cloths, spunbond filter cloths, needlefelt filter cloths, knitted fiber filter cloths; ceramic filter candles for use in machines for gas filtration or dust filtration; belts, fabrics and felts, forming fabrics, press fabrics, dryer fabrics, all for use in papermaking machines; screens and sieves, all for use with vibratory screening and sifting apparatus for vacuum filtration, pressure filtration, gravity filtration, centrifuge filtration and screen printing; and processing apparatus for the separation of chemicals and minerals used in the water filtration industry, sewage and waste water treatment industry, chemical, industry, pharmaceutical manufacturing industry, paper and board manufacturing industry, mud drilling industry, gas industry, oil industry, pulp processing industry, mining industry, mineral extraction industry, metallurgical refining industry, food and beverage preparation industry, incineration industry, smelting industry, and building products manufacturing industry; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, dust filters for vacuum cleaners, pressure filters for pressure washing machines; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filter, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with sewage pumps; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with mud drilling machines; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with pulp refining machines; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with mineral extraction machines which remove solid chemical substances; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with metallurgical refining machines; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with machines used for process filtration in the pharmaceutical industry; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with chemical industry process control machines, namely, dissolving machines, separating machines, emulsifying machines, and sorting machines; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with paper manufacturing industry process control machines, namely, paper reeling machines and paper shredding machines; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with oil drilling and refining industry process control machines, mining industry process control machines, namely, oil well pumping machines, cleaning machines for oil industrial machines, and drilling rig mechanical handling machines; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with food and beverage preparation industry process control machines, namely, packaging machines for food and beverage making machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with water filtration machines; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with sewage purification installations; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with waste water treatment machines; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with incinerators and smoke stacks; filters being parts of industrial installations, namely, vacuum filters, pressure filters, gravity filters and centrifuge filters, all filters for use with smelting machines; dewatering belts and cloths being parts of thickening and dewatering machines for use in treatment of liquids including water, industrial effluent and sewage | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Dewatering belts and cloths made of synthetic fiber fabrics for use in paper and pulp dewatering, wastewater treatment and chemical processing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Madison Filter 981 Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Madison Filter 981 Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Madison Filter 981 Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named CROSIBLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 15, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |