Drawing for MANTONOMOUS

USPTO serial 77726027

MANTONOMOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANTONOMOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce D. Holloway

BRUCE D. HOLLOWAY LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE D. HOLLOWAYP.O. BOX 2059DUBLIN, CA 94568UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009human exoskeletons and body armor, namely, bullet-proof vests, ballistic plates for use with bullet-proof vests and protective clothingACTIVE—
010orthopedic bracesACTIVE—
018backpacksACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, shoes, boots, pants, shirts, jackets, and vestsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 22, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 26, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 26, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 4, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance