USPTO serial 77739646
PASTELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PASTELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose
Brad D. Rose Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | makeup removers, makeup applicators in the nature of cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes, eye creams, facial cleansers, toners, facial exfoliants and scrubs, facial creams, facial moisturizers, facial lotions and non-medicated facial treatments, namely, facial emulsions, wrinkle removing skin care preparations; nail polish removers, nail creams, cuticle removing preparations, and nail buffing preparations; beauty milks, skin moisturizers and skin moisturizer masks, skin conditioners, hand creams, massage oils, essential oils for personal use, talcum powder, perfumed powders, bath beads, bath crystals, bath foam, bath gels, bath oils, bath powders, bath salts, face wash, skin cleansers, skin highlighter, body scrubs, body fragrances, fragrances for personal use, body and hand lotions, body gels, shower gels, body oils, body powders, body exfoliants, body masks, body mask creams and lotions, shaving preparations, after shave lotions, shaving balm, shaving cream, shaving gel, skin abrasive preparations, non-medicated skin creams and skin lotions for relieving razor burns, sunscreen preparations, suntanning preparations and after-sun lotions; cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; sun tan oils; self-tanning preparations, namely, self tanning milk and cream, accelerated tanning cream, self-tanning lotions, gels and sprays; perfume, perfume oils, cologne, eau de toilette, eau de perfume, eau de cologne and toilette water; toothpaste, deodorant and antiperspirant; cosmetic pads, pre-moistened cosmetic wipes, pre-moistened cosmetic tissues and towelettes; cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; all purpose cotton swabs for personal use and cosmetic purposes; non-medicated topical skin creams, gels, toners and lotions; general purpose non-medicated mentholated skin ointment not for medical use; non-medicated skin ointments for the prevention and treatment of sunburn; non-medicated topical sprays and powders for cosmetic use; aromatherapy creams, lotions and oils; hair care products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, mousse, gels, frosts, creams, rinses, sprays, hair color, hair waving lotion, permanent wave preparations, hair lighteners, hair dyes, hair emollients, hair mascara, hair pomades, hair color removers, hair relaxing preparations, hair styling preparations, hair removing cream, and hair care preparations; astringents for cosmetic purposes; baby wipes; disposable wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds for personal hygiene and household use; incense; room fragrances; fragrance emitting wicks for room fragrances; sachets; sachet-like eye pillows containing fragrances; scented ceramic stones; scented linen sprays and scented room sprays; scented oils used to produce aromas when heated; scented pine cones; potpourri; aromatherapy pillows comprising potpourri in fabric containers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 31, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |