USPTO serial 77745578
FRESH · FOOD · FAST ON THE FLY KARTS · CATERING · KAFES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRESH · FOOD · FAST ON THE FLY KARTS · CATERING · KAFES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Washington, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura E. Jordan, Esq.
LAURA E. JORDAN, ESQ. LAW OFFICES OF LAURA E. JORDAN, P.C.4702 WISCONSIN AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20016-4610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products for sale and for consumption in restaurants and vending carts, namely, prepared foods, namely, fruit salads and vegetable salads; packaged foods, namely, fruit salads and vegetable salads | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2006 |
| 030 | Food products for sale and for consumption in restaurants and vending carts, namely, pizza; crepes; breakfast foods in the nature of bagels; pastries; natural foods and food products in the nature of natural brown sugar; prepared foods, namely, macaroni salads, pasta salads, rice salads, rice pilaf, sandwiches, tacos, and panini; packaged foods, namely, macaroni salads, pasta salads, rice salads, rice pilaf, sandwiches, tacos, and panini | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |