Drawing for AXIENT

USPTO serial 77755300

AXIENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AXIENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcia A. Auberger

MARCIA A. AUBERGER VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing technical consulting services and information management services, namely, clinical data and regulatory submission management to pharmaceutical companies and medical product and device companies, to assist them with clinical research, clinical trials and applications for drug, product, or device approvalACTIVE—
042Medical and scientific research, namely, conducting clinical trials; laboratory research in the field of pharmaceuticals and medical products and devices; and providing medical and scientific research information in the field of pharmaceuticals, medical products and devices, and clinical trialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2010ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 29, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 6, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance