Drawing for WOODSTOCK CERTIFIED

USPTO serial 77774982

WOODSTOCK CERTIFIED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WOODSTOCK CERTIFIED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.

JONATHAN D. REICHMAN, ESQ. KENYON & KENYON LLP1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
APrinted matter and publications, household goods, accessories, linens, floor coverings, jewelry, clocks, camping equipment and furniture, gardening tools, games, music, videos, clothing, head wear and footwear, leather goods, consumer goods, toys and playthings, and electronics manufactured in an environmentally conscious mannerACTIVE—
BEnvironmental services, namely, provision of information regarding environmental awareness, conservation and ecological responsibility, sustainability, environment protection, waste management, and environmentally friendly products; Entertainment services, namely, conducting of music and dramatic productions; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of music concerts and music festivalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 2, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 2, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 8, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 10, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 10, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 10, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 10, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance