USPTO serial 77797991
GOECOLIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOECOLIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer V. Whiting
Jennifer V. Whiting J Whiting Law14431 Ventura Blvd., #607Sherman Oaks, CA 91423UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Ink cartridges for printers, Ink jet cartridges, Ink jet printer ink, Toner, Toner cartridges | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | trash bags; trash bags for disposing of pet waste; trash bags especially designed for use with home or office paper and media shredders; biodegradable bags, namely, trash bags, trash bags for disposing of pet waste, and trash bags especially designed for use with home or office paper and media shredders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |