CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MHSC

USPTO serial 77799347

MHSC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MHSC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Durlacher

JAMES M. DURLACHER WOODARD EMHARDT MORIARTY MCNETT & HENRY111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Distributorship services in the field of heating products, namely, hearths and fireplaces, and in the field of outdoor products, namely, barbecues and grillsACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture of heating products, namely, hearths and fireplaces, and of outdoor products, namely, barbecues and grillsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes for sales, installation, troubleshooting and certification of service personnel to gas industry standards in the field of wood-burning and gas-burning fireplaces; gas logs and fireplace insertsACTIVE—
042Design and development of heating products, namely, hearths and fireplaces, and of outdoor products, namely, barbecues and grillsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 28, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 28, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 6, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 12, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance