Drawing for WHY SPREAD GERMS?

USPTO serial 77812972

WHY SPREAD GERMS?

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHY SPREAD GERMS??

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill K. Tomlinson

JILL K. TOMLINSON COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010APPAREL FOR MEDICAL USE, NAMELY, SCRUB TOPS, SCRUB PANTS, PATIENT GOWNS, ISOLATION GOWNS AND JACKETS; SURGICAL SHOE COVERS; SURGICAL GOWNS; PATIENT EXAMINATION GOWNS; MASKS FOR USE BY MEDICAL PERSONNELACTIVE—
024TEXTILE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BED BLANKETS, TOWELS OF TEXTILE, BED SHEETS AND BED SPREADS, PILLOW CASES, TABLECLOTHS OF TEXTILE, NAPKINS OF TEXTILE, AND CURTAINS OF TEXTILEACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, UNIFORMS, LAB COATS, LAB JACKETS, COVERALLS, FOOTWEAR; NURSE PANTS; PANTS; SCRUBS NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES, APRONS, JACKETS, T-SHIRTS, PANTS, SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, CAPS, CHEF'S HATS, CHEF'S JACKETSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 17, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 14, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 12, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 4, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 26, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 25, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 17, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 17, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance