Drawing for MARCEL'S

USPTO serial 77816672

MARCEL'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARCEL'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey A. Smith

JEFFREY A SMITH MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3360UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk; milk based beverages, namely, beverages consisting principally of milk; yogurt; yogurt based beveragesACTIVE—
030Frozen yogurts and confections made from or with yogurt; ice cream; ice cream drinks; ices; milk shakesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 14, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 14, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 14, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 2, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 29, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 29, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 1, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 1, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 14, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 11, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 7, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 26, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 16, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 16, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 11, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 7, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 21, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 4, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance