USPTO serial 77823776
INTELLIGENT MEDICAL DATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3976101Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2011
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTELLIGENT MEDICAL DATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis W. Beech
DENNIS W. BEECH LAW OFFICES OF DENNIS W. BEECHPO BOX 519MURRIETA, CA 92564-0519UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in the creation, collection, processing, storage and use of medical patient information, medical procedures, and information for surgical implants, prosthesis and other artificial medical elements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 5, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |